Any Strategy Guides currently being scanned?

[kitsunebi]

22 minutes ago, slider1983 said:

I feel it's important to keep a magazine whole if possible. Why would I destroy I magazine just because I want to scan it? I'd rather pass it onto someone and preserve it longer. Some scanners only care about digital preservation which is wrong because physical preservation is just as important for magazines.

Again, there's nothing wrong with being a collector and preserving a copy for your own personal enjoyment.  People who want to preserve the contents in a way that can be appreciated by hundreds/thousands/millions/unlimited numbers of people who don't have access to the physical mag are those who have answered the call of the scanner.

Scanning is literally about creating a digital copy that does not depend upon the possession or even the existence of the physical mag to be enjoyed.  No one is disputing that preserving physical copies is also important, but the fact remains that the best scan is created from a destroyed mag.  And so, like I said, there are scanners, and there are collectors.  If all scanners were ALSO collectors, then we wouldn't have nearly so many quality scans.

Luckily, most of these magazines are fairly common with thousands of copies (or more) floating around out there and periodically showing up on sale, and so far as I know, no one has ever destroyed the last copy in existence of a mag in order to scan it, so there's no reason that scanners can't continue to do their job to the best of their abilities, guilt-free.  

[slider1983]

1 hour ago, kitsunebi said:

Again, there's nothing wrong with being a collector and preserving a copy for your own personal enjoyment.  People who want to preserve the contents in a way that can be appreciated by hundreds/thousands/millions/unlimited numbers of people who don't have access to the physical mag are those who have answered the call of the scanner.

I'm not a collector if I'm selling my magazines on. You're correct that there's thankfully a lot of copies of particular magazines out there but as someone who believes in both physical and digital preservation I find it possible to create a quality scan without destroying the source.

[Gregorick]

If you can find a way to create a scan of these irregularly-shaped British mags with horrendously placed and generously applied glue without wrecking them then please let me know!

 

My biggest challenge is trying to get the pages to scan without having huge glue marks/tears etc. on them. Thankfully, @kitsunebi has helped me with some heat gun tips so I can better move the glue for some future scans. Or at least that's the hope, will be interesting to see the results.

[kitsunebi]

33 minutes ago, slider1983 said:

I'm not a collector if I'm selling my magazines on. You're correct that there's thankfully a lot of copies of particular magazines out there but as someone who believes in both physical and digital preservation I find it possible to create a quality scan without destroying the source.

I don't want to argue across forums on two separate sites.  The question was, can a mag be scanned without debinding.  I answered that yes, yes it can.  But it will not be as good as a debound scan.  It simply isn't possible in most instances. 

If you're scanning skimpy 70 page stapled mags, then yes, you can make a pretty good scan of a bound mag.  But the quality is still almost definitely going to be at least slightly better on a properly debound mag being squeezed through an ADF.  And if you're talking about a thick square bound mag, forget about trying to make a scan while bound that can compare to an unbound scan.  Its impossible, and I'm sure every scanner here would agree with that point.

If you're happy with your own scans, that's all that matters.  And there's nothing stopping the original poster of the question from continuing to try to scan the mag while bound (though he has admitted being dissatisfied with the results).  If "good enough" is good enough, then all's well.  But if "best possible" is the goal, then debinding is almost always necessary.  I say again, this isn't my own isolated opinion, but rather one shared by every regularly productive scanner I've ever met on any site, and its the reason why the majority of mags released here are debound.

So my only point is that anyone wanting the best possible scan needs to accept the fact that they can't have both that AND be able to keep their mag intact.  It's a sacrifice either way.  If you want the best possible scan, you can't have an intact mag.  And if you want an intact mag, you can't have the best possible scan.  If keeping the mag intact is important to you, no worries.  No one is forcing anyone to debind anything against their will, and depending on the length and binding of the mag, a pretty good scan of a bound mag might be possible given enough extra time and effort.

I personally take offense at the implication that someone choosing to sacrifice one copy of a mag in order to create the best possible scan that can reach unlimited numbers of people until the end of time (so long as the data isn't lost) is somehow doing less for preservation than someone who lets a mag rot in their closet for 30 years before selling it on eBay to someone else who will do the same ad infinitum until the pages become so brown and brittle it can't even be read.  There are mags here which have been downloaded by thousands of people.  I sincerely doubt any single physical mag could ever change hands that many times to reach that many people.

At any rate, any scan is better than no scan and all scans are appreciated. So I hope to one day see you release some of your scans which I've been hearing about for years.

[Interesting]

I'll probably just stick with the one Consumer Guide one then, since it's coil bound with a wire and that's super easy to de-bind, scan, and reattach for me, and probably any of those other types that are similar. Other than that, I can at least offer to scan things on my own time later on (I work at a print shop so I'd have to do it while it's slow on my own time, which may take a while).

[kitsunebi]

Don't let yourself be discouraged by anything but your own efforts.  If you can manage to create a scan you're happy with, that's all that matters.

When I scanned my first few scans, they were bound mags on a flatbed.  I quickly realized there was no way I could scan hundreds of mags that way,since it took far too long and gave results I wasn't 100% content with.  So I bought my first ADF scanner and a heat gun, and went to work rescanning and replacing the mags I had previously scanned.

But if you don't mind the time and are happy with the results, don't let anyone convince you to stop if you don't want to.

[slider1983]

1 hour ago, Gregorick said:

If you can find a way to create a scan of these irregularly-shaped British mags with horrendously placed and generously applied glue without wrecking them then please let me know!

 

My biggest challenge is trying to get the pages to scan without having huge glue marks/tears etc. on them. Thankfully, @kitsunebi has helped me with some heat gun tips so I can better move the glue for some future scans. Or at least that's the hope, will be interesting to see the results.

I can't say I've had a problem on the ones I've had to scan so far apart from the bookazines and Radio Times, the latter was a nightmare and an exception where I did have to destroy the mag to scan it.

[Rando1975]

10 hours ago, kitsunebi said:

Scanning mags isn't something to be precious about.  My view is: your goal as a scanner should always be to create a scan so good that you'll never have a need to look at the physical copy again.  If you're happier reading the print copy, why bother making the scan in the first place?

100% this. I'd certainly like to keep some of the guides I've donated, but the end result in sacrificing it look REALLY good, so I can't complain. I can't wrap my head around how much work it is to have the scans look so good.  

[tcaud]

Something you might want to look out for (assuming it's not already scanned and I don't think it is)... way back in the early 90s I remember seeing a strategy guide which had hand drawn maps for popular Nintendo games. Both Zelda 2 and Kid Icarus were featured.

[Bufo]

I come bearing gifts of rare guides - after a year of searching, I have at last found the BradyGames guides for Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles Echoes of Time and Crystal Bearers, and scanned them myself! These are the first whole guides I've ever scanned, so I know they're not perfect, but they ARE entirely legible and I believe the very first time these particular guides have ever been digitized. I've uploaded them to archive.org, but feel free to host them here as well.

I'm quite proud of them, but as I said I'm very new at this so be gentle!

[tcaud]

On 10/25/2024 at 4:01 AM, tcaud said:

Something you might want to look out for (assuming it's not already scanned and I don't think it is)... way back in the early 90s I remember seeing a strategy guide which had hand drawn maps for popular Nintendo games. Both Zelda 2 and Kid Icarus were featured.

I did some sleuthing and found this strategy guide at Internet Archive, apparently the first production by Nintendo's magazine dept.

https://archive.org/details/The_Official_Nintendo_Players_Guide_1987/mode/2up

I believe this to be the guide I remembered, although I could be wrong. (the guide is notably not hosted here)

[kitsunebi]

7 hours ago, tcaud said:

I believe this to be the guide I remembered, although I could be wrong. (the guide is notably not hosted here)

That guide was everywhere for a while back in the day - I think it was given away in different promotions.  Someone in the comments mentions getting it free with their NES.  Did Nintendo Power ever give it away with subscriptions?

At any rate, we may not have it here, but it originally came from SOMEWHERE other than the URL you linked to, since Sketch the Cow (Jason Scott) isn't a scanner, just a re-poster (or "professional archivist" if you want to make it sound fancy.)